<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 519 &#8211; Building the Ultimate White Box for under $2000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519</link>
	<description>Trust Your Technolust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayd</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-42829</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-42829</guid>
		<description>four Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB drives? in a raid array isn&#039;t that why they have the RE2,3 or 4&#039;s...won&#039;t these drop out constantly? Not sure WDTLER.EXE will work on these newer drives also, let me know if it does, I would mind saving a buck but I don&#039;t need the headache of rebuilding the arrays each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>four Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB drives? in a raid array isn&#8217;t that why they have the RE2,3 or 4&#8242;s&#8230;won&#8217;t these drop out constantly? Not sure WDTLER.EXE will work on these newer drives also, let me know if it does, I would mind saving a buck but I don&#8217;t need the headache of rebuilding the arrays each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-41878</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-41878</guid>
		<description>I realize this is an old episode but I am curious as to the raid type you made with the controller and four drives.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this is an old episode but I am curious as to the raid type you made with the controller and four drives.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flipping Geek:The Ultimate Site Flipping Guide. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-41604</link>
		<dc:creator>Flipping Geek:The Ultimate Site Flipping Guide. &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-41604</guid>
		<description>[...] Flip Upgrades MiniCam Line with Hi-Def MinoHD &#124; TopTenREVIEWS Holiday Gift GuideTECHZEST- Express Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flip Video Pocket Camcorders with Wi-FiKore News 55 - Kore New Media gets Flipped! Soap Powder. &#124; Kore New Media PodcastsMiklb&#039;s Mindless RamblingsHak5 &#8211; Technolust since 2005 &#187; Episode 519 &#8211; Building the Ultimate White B... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flip Upgrades MiniCam Line with Hi-Def MinoHD | TopTenREVIEWS Holiday Gift GuideTECHZEST- Express Technology &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Flip Video Pocket Camcorders with Wi-FiKore News 55 &#8211; Kore New Media gets Flipped! Soap Powder. | Kore New Media PodcastsMiklb&#39;s Mindless RamblingsHak5 &#8211; Technolust since 2005 &raquo; Episode 519 &#8211; Building the Ultimate White B&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lee</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-38881</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-38881</guid>
		<description>You were singing the praises of the Asus P6T motherboard... I was wondering what sets this board apart from others and makes you such a fan?

Thanks,
Bill...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were singing the praises of the Asus P6T motherboard&#8230; I was wondering what sets this board apart from others and makes you such a fan?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Bill&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-38351</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-38351</guid>
		<description>Good thing for archived show notes. I&#039;m going to be using this as a guide to build, instead of a VM server, a backup server. Throw a bunch of 1TB drives in there, go a bit less on the mobo/proc/ram combo and have a nice box with a crapton of storage to throw backup files on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing for archived show notes. I&#8217;m going to be using this as a guide to build, instead of a VM server, a backup server. Throw a bunch of 1TB drives in there, go a bit less on the mobo/proc/ram combo and have a nice box with a crapton of storage to throw backup files on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smith</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-38293</link>
		<dc:creator>smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-38293</guid>
		<description>Very informative episode on EXSi.

Would you do a followup on your experiences with the box now that it is in production.

What proplems you may have encountered.

What you might have done differently?

Sort of the pros/cons of doing a box in this manner.

I am now building a box similar to this one and such information would be very valuable.

Thank you for the great episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative episode on EXSi.</p>
<p>Would you do a followup on your experiences with the box now that it is in production.</p>
<p>What proplems you may have encountered.</p>
<p>What you might have done differently?</p>
<p>Sort of the pros/cons of doing a box in this manner.</p>
<p>I am now building a box similar to this one and such information would be very valuable.</p>
<p>Thank you for the great episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-37607</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-37607</guid>
		<description>And never mind I jumped the gun, just found the forums page..... thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And never mind I jumped the gun, just found the forums page&#8230;.. thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-37606</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-37606</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Great Episode! But I was wondering what you used for a power supply? Off the cuff it does not look like the case came with on and the details about the episode did not list one.... Just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Great Episode! But I was wondering what you used for a power supply? Off the cuff it does not look like the case came with on and the details about the episode did not list one&#8230;. Just wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glitch</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-37164</link>
		<dc:creator>Glitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-37164</guid>
		<description>Very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-36792</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-36792</guid>
		<description>The song during the build was one off Pronobozo&#039;s Zero = One = Everything album. You can find it at www.pronobozo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The song during the build was one off Pronobozo&#8217;s Zero = One = Everything album. You can find it at <a href="http://www.pronobozo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pronobozo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarrenB</title>
		<link>http://Hak5.org/episodes/episode-519#comment-36744</link>
		<dc:creator>DarrenB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hak5.org/?p=1167#comment-36744</guid>
		<description>What, not using ECC memory in a server? That could come back to byte you in the future. 

I think people underestimate the level of soft bit errors that occurs in non-ECC memory, especially in a box that is being aggresively used in a server environment. A soft-bit error is a bit-flip that occurs randomly that otherwise is undetectable as a hard error with tools like memtest86, etc.

I learnt my lesson earlier this year and now believe that with increased memory density, that the probabity for a soft bit error occuring in RAM is similar to the increase in the probability of HDD failures as HDD densities have increased. We all accept for HDD&#039;s, the statement of &quot;It&#039;s not a question of if it will fail, it&#039;s a question of when?&quot;, and as such the case of HDD failure is so accepted now, that in any serious scenario RAID is a defacto consideration for handling the &quot;expected&quot; HDD failure. I trust that soon the same scenario for RAM will eventually transpire, empathsizing the need for ECC RAM.

So, in the end why use RAID with the HDD&#039;s, but not use ECC RAM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, not using ECC memory in a server? That could come back to byte you in the future. </p>
<p>I think people underestimate the level of soft bit errors that occurs in non-ECC memory, especially in a box that is being aggresively used in a server environment. A soft-bit error is a bit-flip that occurs randomly that otherwise is undetectable as a hard error with tools like memtest86, etc.</p>
<p>I learnt my lesson earlier this year and now believe that with increased memory density, that the probabity for a soft bit error occuring in RAM is similar to the increase in the probability of HDD failures as HDD densities have increased. We all accept for HDD&#8217;s, the statement of &#8220;It&#8217;s not a question of if it will fail, it&#8217;s a question of when?&#8221;, and as such the case of HDD failure is so accepted now, that in any serious scenario RAID is a defacto consideration for handling the &#8220;expected&#8221; HDD failure. I trust that soon the same scenario for RAM will eventually transpire, empathsizing the need for ECC RAM.</p>
<p>So, in the end why use RAID with the HDD&#8217;s, but not use ECC RAM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  hak5.org/episodes/episode-519/feed ) in 0.86860 seconds, on May 22nd, 2012 at 10:09 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2012 at 11:09 am UTC -->
