<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hak5 1108 &#8211; Hak5 Special: Proxies &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108</link>
	<description>Trust Your Technolust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:05:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50253</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure you can run a proxy server at home. We actually cover setting these up in both Windows and Linux over the next two episodes. If there was a MITM at the coffee shop you would indeed be giving up the IP of your home server. Also keep in mind what you&#039;re doing here is shifting the trust from the open WiFi network (low trust IMHO) to your home or VPS. Sure your VPS provider could be sniffing, but then again so can your ISP so at the end of the day you just have to ask yourself, who do you trust?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure you can run a proxy server at home. We actually cover setting these up in both Windows and Linux over the next two episodes. If there was a MITM at the coffee shop you would indeed be giving up the IP of your home server. Also keep in mind what you&#8217;re doing here is shifting the trust from the open WiFi network (low trust IMHO) to your home or VPS. Sure your VPS provider could be sniffing, but then again so can your ISP so at the end of the day you just have to ask yourself, who do you trust?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TuffRank</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50233</link>
		<dc:creator>TuffRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[m8! you are well-off with your OSI understanding /concept ... first thing first; 

Quote; &quot;proxies and NAT and essentially one in the same&quot; that is incorrect...  Go back to your study guides or your youtube vids &amp; refresh your Knowledge r follow on... 

However, I do agree with you with using the OSI and TCP/IP layer Blueprint for explaining how Internetworking Works...

Think about NAT &amp; Proxy this way.

Do not confuse a proxy server with a NAT (Network Address Translation) device. A proxy server connects to, responds to, and receives traffic from the Internet, acting on behalf of the client computer, while a NAT device transparently changes the origination address of traffic coming through it before passing it to the Internet...

OSI concept;

For those who understand the OSI (Open System Interconnection) model of networking, the technical difference between a proxy and a NAT is that the proxy server works on the transport layer (layer 4) or higher of the OSI model, whereas a NAT works on the network layer (layer 3).

Oh yeah!!

 &gt;&gt; SOCKS performs at Layer 5 of the OSI modelâ€”the session layer (an intermediate layer between the presentation layer and the transport layer).

Great work Mr. Kitchen  and pretty girl Shannon... Give-Thx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m8! you are well-off with your OSI understanding /concept &#8230; first thing first; </p>
<p>Quote; &#8220;proxies and NAT and essentially one in the same&#8221; that is incorrect&#8230;  Go back to your study guides or your youtube vids &amp; refresh your Knowledge r follow on&#8230; </p>
<p>However, I do agree with you with using the OSI and TCP/IP layer Blueprint for explaining how Internetworking Works&#8230;</p>
<p>Think about NAT &amp; Proxy this way.</p>
<p>Do not confuse a proxy server with a NAT (Network Address Translation) device. A proxy server connects to, responds to, and receives traffic from the Internet, acting on behalf of the client computer, while a NAT device transparently changes the origination address of traffic coming through it before passing it to the Internet&#8230;</p>
<p>OSI concept;</p>
<p>For those who understand the OSI (Open System Interconnection) model of networking, the technical difference between a proxy and a NAT is that the proxy server works on the transport layer (layer 4) or higher of the OSI model, whereas a NAT works on the network layer (layer 3).</p>
<p>Oh yeah!!</p>
<p> &gt;&gt; SOCKS performs at Layer 5 of the OSI modelâ€”the session layer (an intermediate layer between the presentation layer and the transport layer).</p>
<p>Great work Mr. Kitchen  and pretty girl Shannon&#8230; Give-Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -Sh@@n-</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50191</link>
		<dc:creator>-Sh@@n-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 07:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey man.....

itz awsum... I mean to say that this show is ultimate for

all who want to Learn Security(also other) from BASIC -----&gt; ADVANCE...

I really Like it ..... and mostly &quot;GO THROUGH IT&quot;
.....

Thanks ...to all]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man&#8230;..</p>
<p>itz awsum&#8230; I mean to say that this show is ultimate for</p>
<p>all who want to Learn Security(also other) from BASIC &#8212;&#8211;&gt; ADVANCE&#8230;</p>
<p>I really Like it &#8230;.. and mostly &#8220;GO THROUGH IT&#8221;<br />
&#8230;..</p>
<p>Thanks &#8230;to all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50190</link>
		<dc:creator>Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howdy,

I am excited about starting to use proxies. So since we don&#039;t know if the free proxy servers out there are logging the traffic for their evil purposes and if we go with the same line of thought that vps could in theory also log your info, I was wondering if i could run my own proxy server at home. 

Then the question becomes, if i am at my favorite wifi location and I connect to my proxy at home so i can safely check my 2 emails i get a week, connecting to the proxy server would give the &quot;man in black&quot; the ip address of my home proxy server and they can start doing the evil things they do.

I am guessing there is no way around this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy,</p>
<p>I am excited about starting to use proxies. So since we don&#8217;t know if the free proxy servers out there are logging the traffic for their evil purposes and if we go with the same line of thought that vps could in theory also log your info, I was wondering if i could run my own proxy server at home. </p>
<p>Then the question becomes, if i am at my favorite wifi location and I connect to my proxy at home so i can safely check my 2 emails i get a week, connecting to the proxy server would give the &#8220;man in black&#8221; the ip address of my home proxy server and they can start doing the evil things they do.</p>
<p>I am guessing there is no way around this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rami_info</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50177</link>
		<dc:creator>rami_info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi hak5 crew

Is it possible to go back to metasploit with new modules of 2012.

Thnx and hope goooooooooooooooood luck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi hak5 crew</p>
<p>Is it possible to go back to metasploit with new modules of 2012.</p>
<p>Thnx and hope goooooooooooooooood luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50170</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PROXIES ago! 
Totally digging this. Can&#039;t wait to re-watch and see what comes next. 
Great show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PROXIES ago!<br />
Totally digging this. Can&#8217;t wait to re-watch and see what comes next.<br />
Great show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobolt</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50167</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[shannon Just love your boobs in those tight T-shirt&#039;s... 
More tight tops please, :-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shannon Just love your boobs in those tight T-shirt&#8217;s&#8230;<br />
More tight tops please, <img src='http://hak5.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50164</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the ETA on the next part? Leaving for China in 10 days!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the ETA on the next part? Leaving for China in 10 days!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slickkk</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50156</link>
		<dc:creator>Slickkk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the tools that are out are coming out are being developed slower than your episodes.  They used to be way longer and better; must be running out of material.  And btw Darrin you screwed up big time with not being with that chick, you must take a lot of showers lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the tools that are out are coming out are being developed slower than your episodes.  They used to be way longer and better; must be running out of material.  And btw Darrin you screwed up big time with not being with that chick, you must take a lot of showers lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: signal7</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50152</link>
		<dc:creator>signal7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was a very Interesting presentation on using proxies and I must
admit, I learned a few things along the way.  However, some packet
captures of the session using a dynamic port shows that all of the DNS
requests still go to the locally defined DNS server.  So, even though
the information itself is tunneled and encrypted, *where* you&#039;re going
online is not protected.  It would be trivial to defeat this proxy
with a filtering DNS provider or even a firewall that can do deep
enough packet inspection.  At the very least, your provider could log
the DNS queries for later use, whatever that may be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a very Interesting presentation on using proxies and I must<br />
admit, I learned a few things along the way.  However, some packet<br />
captures of the session using a dynamic port shows that all of the DNS<br />
requests still go to the locally defined DNS server.  So, even though<br />
the information itself is tunneled and encrypted, *where* you&#8217;re going<br />
online is not protected.  It would be trivial to defeat this proxy<br />
with a filtering DNS provider or even a firewall that can do deep<br />
enough packet inspection.  At the very least, your provider could log<br />
the DNS queries for later use, whatever that may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dortizesquivel</title>
		<link>http://hak5.org/episodes/hak5-1108#comment-50148</link>
		<dc:creator>dortizesquivel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Hak5.org/?p=4717#comment-50148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great video! waiting the next!! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video! waiting the next!! <img src='http://hak5.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
